Under the Radar

Quietly running your startup.

This article was published on May 19, 2010.
So far, 17 people have left a comment.
Do you want to leave a comment?

My friend Anthony Volodkin of Hype Machine once said to me: "Tech coverage is nice for showing your mother." I couldn't agree more. Anthony's Hype Machine is a bootstrapped company, like Carbonmade, with little coverage from tech publications or mainstream press. We were having dinner and the topic of why we like it like that came up. Then last week it came up again with another set of entrepreneurs. I want to expand on those two conversations here.

Under the Radar

Tech Coverage Can Help, Sometimes

Tech coverage is almost impossible to say no to. And why would you? Human beings are programmed to (1) want external feedback and (2) be talked about. If TechCrunch, GigaOM, etc., want to cover your startup, then you're going to be thrilled and sure as hell going to provide them with answers to any questions they may have — within reason.

Tech coverage alone, however, has little to do with your success — almost nothing in most cases. There is the occasional company that it can truly make a difference for. An obvious example today is Foursquare, which has been the media's darling the past year, appearing in every tech publication and most offline publications too — like the New York Times, Wall St. Journal, and others.

Arguably, Foursquare would probably have gotten to where they are today through the quality of their product and their team alone, but still, hundreds of thousands of their 1.2 million reported users must have come from these write-ups. For them, without a doubt, tech coverage has played a huge role in their growth. Foursquare's success relies on huge numbers of people — it's useless if none of your friends use it — so every one of those new eyeballs is a potential customer. That's just not the case for most startups.

Other companies like Carbonmade and Hype Machine rely very little on social networking. These products work as well with one user as they do with ten million. Not only do we not need a large network of users to be successful, it's also the case that the tech audience has little reason to use our products. Coverage may lead to a few hundred signups from interested entrepreneurs wanting to know how our product works, but they'll be in and out by the end of the day.

Carbonmade, Hype Machine, and ninety-nine out of a hundred startups out there should instead be going after press inside their market. For example, Carsonified — one of the leading design blogs — wrote about Carbonmade a few months ago and the signups from that article drove returning users. Publications in which the readership is made up of the same people who would use your startup is where you need to be focused. Don't go out of your way in search of anything else.

Overhype Can Be Deadly

It's like being the popular kid in high school. The spotlight is both good and bad. You'll get the pretty girls, invited to all the right parties, and looked up to as the cool guy. But with that special attention you end up spending more time maintaining your superfluous rep than studying and improving your future self.

When you're running a startup you can easily slip into caring more about the image of your company than its inner workings. An example of this is when a company announces a round of financing and everyone applauds their "success." What success?

Last week when this topic came up over dinner, we talked about one company in particular that raised money riding the hype of the hottest new thing: location based services (LBS). While their product wasn't even near ready yet, on all the tech blogs their name was being lumped together with the other companies in that sector. This was partly due to the sector they're in and partly because of the list of investors they'd attracted.

When their product was finally released, they had a flood of new users trying it out. Sadly, the product needed a lot more work, and all these excited new users were disappointed and turned off. It's just like going to see an overhyped movie and being disappointed that it didn't deliver. You're more upset now, because you'd played it up so much in your head. If you had simply gone and seen the movie with no expectations, then you'd be focusing on the good rather than the bad.

This company is now struggling to stay afloat under all the extra pressure of the hype. They have to constantly innovate to try and shake off the stigma of an under-whelming product, which puts a lot of stress on the team.

Staying "Stealth"

Besides the struggle to live up to overhype, there is the constant threat of copycats if you get too much tech press. Just look at what's happening to Groupon and Gilt. Their hype (well deserved) has led to hundreds of copycats in the United States and overseas. These copycats are little threat to Groupon and Gilt these days, but there are plenty of smaller startups that may not fare so well with added competitors.

It's now considered best by many startups not to disclose that they've received funding. They want to attract less attention. Given how quickly you can build a product and raise money these days, it's better to keep things low key for as long as possible.

People come up to me all the time thinking that Carbonmade is a little side project or just a part-time thing. "You make money on that?" they ask. "Just enough to get by." I respond. Why invite more people into your space? Check your ego at the door. You don't need to talk about the 1.5 million you raised, the 10 employees you have, or the swanky new downtown loft you're renting.

Comments

Wesley Verhoeve about 3 months ago

That's exactly why I don't care to have Family Records written up in say Billboard. Yes it would be an ego boost to receive recognition, but really in the end what purpose does it serve in the long run?

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry about 3 months ago

Wesley: Would being written up in Billboard get you more sales? Isn't that your audience, though? I'm arguing that you should go after coverage, but only after the right coverage and only when you're ready.

Grant about 3 months ago

Great post. I wish I had something to add, but I think you nailed it.

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry about 3 months ago

Grant: Thank you!

Eduardo Sasso about 3 months ago

Great post. I've never thought this way. Thanks.

Brad about 3 months ago

Spencer, I greatly appreciate the way you clarify the thoughts that go through a business builder's head and I agree with the sentiment in this post, but I wouldn't necessarily refer to it as ''under the radar''

What this post says to me is: be weary of chasing the wrong radars. For your purposes, Carsonified is a sweet spot, techcrunch and gigaom are superfluous.

In the case of Groupon it did them far better to be written up in the local papers where their users were than the tech press where their potential competitors lurked.

On the whole though I think you've nailed it, and in a lot of cases no press or little press is more beneficial than the wrong press which turns you into the popular kid.

Tangentially you might find Joey Roth's submission to 48 HR mag interesting and relevant, a pretty cool visualization of how we should talk about the things we make and put out into the world: http://joeyroth.com/charlatan-martyr-hustler/

Greg Thomas about 3 months ago

Very interesting post, really offers a lot to think about. Thanks, Spencer

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry about 3 months ago

Eduardo: That's the highest compliment you can give a writer. Thank you very much!

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry about 3 months ago

Brad: You bring up a good point about the title. I was struggling for hours trying to come up with something fitting. I failed. ''Be Wary of Chasing the Wrong Radars'' or something in that same vein would have been better.

Groupon is a company filled with amazing marketers. I heard early on that they just cold called/emailed as many local businesses as they could instead of looking for press. They definitely went after their market in a successful way that didn't attract too much competition early on.

Mohcin Shah about 3 months ago

One of the most useful startup posts I have read lately. Thanks, Spencer

Manu Gill about 3 months ago

Awesome post! I always thought that hype was good but realized the fact now...

Wesley Verhoeve about 3 months ago

Wesley: Would being written up in Billboard get you more sales? Isn't that your audience, though?

Arguably it's not. Do you read Billboard? I bet you don't, and I don't blame you. It's a trade magazine, not a consumer magazine. The subscription is over $200 for example.

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry about 3 months ago

Wesley: Yeah. I definitely don't read billboard. So while it doesn't directly produce greater sales, it may still have some impact on promoters and industry people that may help get your band greater attention? I guess I have no clue about that. Haha.

Shaun Caruso about 3 months ago

If I had a nickel for every time I came to spencerfry.com.. Superb read.

Vince about 3 months ago

Thanks Spencer. Never thought about coverage from this angle. I used to think being covered on Techcrunch or Gigaom was a sign that a startup has ''arrived''. But like you say, getting covered on these high profile blogs most often does nothing much to your bottomline than it does to your own ego.

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry 9 days ago

Shaun: Thanks a lot. Really appreciate that. I hope that I can produce enough high quality articles to make you keep coming back.

Logo of Spencer Fry Spencer Fry 9 days ago

Vince: So very true. Coverage on those publications won't necessarily win you users and revenue.

Leave a comment