Building Blocks

Expanding your service to multiple verticals.

This article was published on December 16, 2009.
So far, 12 people have left a comment.
Do you want to leave a comment?

The other day I had lunch with my friend Phineas Barnes and we chatted about Carbonmade, startups, and other things. One topic that got us excited was the idea of building a service that captures users for one thing then to build out multiple verticals for those same users. Therefore — regardless of initial exponential growth — when you combine the verticals down the road, all the layers stacked on top of each other stimulate exponential growth. (Note: Phineas wrote a follow up piece entitled "Building Blocks (and customer love)".)

Building Blocks

Getting Out The Door

If you try and do too much and extend your service across all its potential verticals from the start, then you're going to be mediocre at a lot of what you're doing and best at none. That's a bad way to get your foot in the door. It's a lot harder to market a suite of services than it is to market one. With Carbonmade we're able to tout ourselves as the best (and recently biggest) online portfolio service for creatives. That's a simple and sweet message that is aligned with our slogan: "Show off your work." If we tried to tackle, say, building five things for creatives from the start, then our message would get jumbled, our service would be confusing, and marketing would be a lot more difficult.

When you have a successful product to springboard from, you can then start to explore other verticals around the same market where your users (most likely) have multiple interests. GoDaddy exemplifies this, with their aggressive up sell process. They've used this springboard approach to make them astonishingly successful. While GoDaddy started off being simply a domain registrar, you can now buy web hosting, SSL certificates, domain monitoring, DNS management, etc. Those are all products that complement the domain you initially set out to buy.

Expanding to Multiple Verticals

To be successful, you should take the approach of building a basic product, but with multiple verticals in mind as you go along. I'd be lying if I said that Carbonmade was started with anything but building a kickass portfolio in mind. However, as you begin to develop out the product, you can see other places to take it and other up sells your users may be interested in. You only have to look at a few of our competitors to see where they took things.

If I were starting a company from scratch, I'd try and come up with an interesting service that could successfully offer other things to its users as soon as possible after the initial build. It's tough, I know, because you want to be focused on building a great product, but at the same time there's only so much you can do around that product to continue to improve it. A vertical that Flickr got into after launching their initial product was offering a printing service — a perfect complement to their photo-sharing app.

Together We've Got Killer Exponential Growth

Now that we've got multiple verticals to build out, creating a simple service such as Carbonmade is even more attractive. If you can somehow successfully execute a handful of verticals that your users are interested in, you can build an amazingly successful company. Added together, you'll be growing at exponential growth rather than linear growth. You've got, say, 100,000 users using your main product, then say 25,000 using each of the five verticals you've built out, then you've got 225,000 users instead of 100,000. If you're growing at 10,000 new users a month and if you count each vertical a user dabbles in as a new user, you can look at it as growing at 22,500 users a month and not just 10,000.

Of course it's better yet if each of your verticals has a fee attached. Users that pay you for one thing are less likely to shop elsewhere if they already trust you and your brand. That's why I get my SSL certificates from GoDaddy along with my domains. You can really start making some serious money if you funnel your paying users into other for-a-fee parts of your app.

Oh, the opportunities!

Comments

phin barnes about 2 years ago

Great post. I would add that there is tremendous value in passionate early adopters over the course of a product lifecycle and that the way to capture these discerning customers is to deliver one thing that they need better than anyone else.

As the product evolves and the audience expands, you can continue to speak to this group because your other customers aspire to be like like the taste makers -- examples of doing this well are Google, NIKE, Porsche, wal-mart. At AND 1 we did this for a long time and then as we departed from our core customer in efforts to accelerate growth, we eroded our base and paid the price. we went from signing Spree the day after he chocked his coach for using the N-word to focusing on maximizing our license business via the kids channel...oops

Spencer Fry about 2 years ago

Oh. Wow. Eroding your core is definitely a bad move. :) I think that as long as you keep true to your original product and vision then you won't lose customers when you expand out. I think the tricky part is when you find your new verticals becoming more popular than your old. What do you do then?

Ryan Graves about 2 years ago

Role with the punches? Your product is always going to evolve.

Spencer Fry about 2 years ago

Ryan: That in response to my question? Your product will always evolve, but the question here is that every vertical is in itself a product. So the question is where to put your resources without alienating your most loyal customers. Phineas mentioned that this was a big problem when he worked at AND 1.

Kevin Holesh about 2 years ago

Interesting approach, Spencer. I had never heard of ''multiple verticals'' before, so I learned a lot.

I would think it would be important for your other products to have something in common with your first product, a complement to your original product so to say.

For Carbonmade, it would be something like ''show off your work...and...get a job on our job board'' rather than ''show off your work...and...come to our basketball clinics.'' One of those doesn't seem to fit and I think you illustrated that point perfectly.

Michael about 2 years ago

Spencer, this is a great article.

''To be successful, you should take the approach of building a basic product, but with multiple verticals in mind as you go along.''

That's extremely smart, and I agree about focusing on doing one thing right i.e. creative portfolios, and building up that community. And then extending and cross-selling complimentary products and services in different verticals.

Another layer to throw on top of this is the power of business partnerships that can achieve the same results (without building an entirely new product or service from scratch). Something to think about.

Spencer Fry about 2 years ago

Kevin: It certainly has to be a compliment to your current product. Otherwise you might as well creative a different brand and put on another website.

Michael: Yeah, business partnerships is a big deal too and in the same vein as the multiple verticals. I just (sadly) don't have have enough experience on that to talk about it. I'm more experienced in just building out products.

David Fraga about 2 years ago

Spencer, I love this post.

Introducing complementary products to a large and loyal customer base is certainly a tried and true growth strategy. Selling a product to a customer that has already worked with you in the past is easier and less costly than acquiring a brand new customer from scratch. This is particularly true for subscription-based businesses like CarbonMade that have an ongoing relationship with subscribers (as opposed to companies with one-and-done sales models).

In addition to being profitable for the company, this kind of cross-promotion is good for customers too: They get to rely on their knowledge of your past performance instead of taking a risk on an untested provider. They also get to meet more of their needs while managing fewer vendors.

That said, adding complementary products doesn't make sense for everyone. I think it is best reserved for companies that have built large customer bases and significant resources. Here is why:

1) Distraction

It is hard enough to build and maintain ONE amazing product that delights your customers and sells like crazy, much less many. Spreading your resources across multiple products only makes sense once you can afford to pay for a division of labor across several rock-star product owners.

2) Conversion rates

There is a trade-off between complexity and conversion rates. The more options that you put between a customer and the ''Buy'' button, the lower your conversion rate will be. While you may get a higher average ticket price with multiple products, you will get fewer new customers. I'm in favor of building a big customer base on the back of one, highly converting offering before starting to diversify.

3) Alternatives

You don't have to offer multiple products yourself in order to benefit from the economics of cross-selling. Through APIs, white-labeling, affiliate programs and rev-share deals, you can allow other companies to do the work of cross-selling your products to their customer base while paying you for the pleasure.

My advice: focus on the core until the cross-sell opportunity is too huge to ignore. In the meanwhile, consider how you can leverage other people's customer relationships to get you there.

Spencer Fry about 2 years ago

''In addition to being profitable for the company, this kind of cross-promotion is good for customers too: They get to rely on their knowledge of your past performance instead of taking a risk on an untested provider''

This is actually something I knew subconsciously, but never thought to write out. That's a very good point. I certainly trust GoDaddy with my domains, so I'm going to trust with with my SSL certificates too.

''My advice: focus on the core until the cross-sell opportunity is too huge to ignore. In the meanwhile, consider how you can leverage other people's customer relationships to get you there.''

Do you think it's worth taking the time out to work with other company's rather than just focusing on your core project until you can do it yourself? It just seems like it'd be difficult for a small team to spend time and resources on partnerships early on. That time might be better spent just focusing on the product. Then once the product is really taking off, they can explore partnerships and building out different verticals.

David Fraga about 2 years ago

At the VERY early stages I think you are right that it makes sense to ruthlessly focus (EX: when the business doesn't yet have a product that's ready for prime-time). However, once you have a live product that you are aggressively trying to sell, I do think it is worth facilitating partnerships. Here are three partnership concepts that can be low-effort relative to their impact:

** Easy cross-marketing **

If you can have one conversation and seal a cross-marketing deal that increases your reach, it is worth your time (see: http://www.ekoventure.com/contest_entries/groupon).

API

If your product lends itself to extension through an API, its probably worth building one. Partners can prove themselves by building on your platform without even talking to you (see: http://twitter.com/downloads).

Rev-Share and Affiliate programs

If other people want to make money selling your product to their customers, build an affiliate infrastructure through which you can ''roll out'' a partnership by generating a single link (see: https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/).

If the partner is big enough and represents a large enough opportunity, you might sweeten the terms or talk to them a couple of times to seal the deal but you won't have to deploy a ton of tech resources (a rev-share link and MAYBE a landing page).

--

As the non-technical co-founder, considering partnerships and deciding what is worth your time is a big part of your job. (see: http://spencerfry.com/whats-a-non-programmer-to-do) :)

I would suspect that some partnership opportunities are well worth your time.

Spencer Fry about 2 years ago

David: I certainly agree with you that partnerships are worth your time... in the long-term. I just think it's difficult for small companies to execute long-lasting partnerships. I think that time is better spent developing the product. However, once you've grown a bit and your product is more stable, I do agree with you that partnerships are a sure way to go.

Armani watch about 1 year ago

Artistically done is richer reconsider than extravagantly said.